Consider you’re working on some sort of project with a group of friends. Everybody has something to do-somebody is writing the introduction, somebody is adding the pictures, and you’re working on the conclusion. Alright, now, imagine not talking for some time but yet still working. What happens? Probably chaos, right? That’s basically what occurs when you’re coding on a team and don’t keep everything updated.
That’s where Git Pull saves the day. It’s a command one uses to keep their local code updated with the changes others have made. You know, so you’re not working on some older version of the code by accident and screwing everything up. In this, you’ll learn what Git Pull is, how it’s used, and even how to avoid some common mistakes that can throw you off. I’ll even add examples to drive the point home.
So, let’s get started.
How Git Pull Works
The git pull is kind of like doing a refresh on your browser in your code. So when you run the command, Git jumps to the remote server, pulls the most recent changes in that folder, and then merges it into your local files. It’s sort of like when you go back into a shared Google Doc, and suddenly it is radically different because your friends have been working on it.
Here is a simple breakdown of what happens when you do a git pull:
1- Fetch: Git checks out the latest from the remote repository but doesn’t apply it yet.
2- Merge: Git now takes those changes and tries to merge them with the stuff you’ve been working on.
If nobody indeed has edited just those lines that you have, all is well. If someone has, though, Git will tap you on the shoulder and say, “Hey, sort this out!” That would be called a merge conflict, and yes, things can get a bit hairy. But don’t you worry, we’ll cover that too.
Git Fetch vs. Git Pull
Although git pull and git fetch resemble each other closely, they are made for different purposes. When it comes to git fetch, there is a distinction here: While fetching the changes in your remote repository, it will disregard attempting to merge any of those modifications into your local repo. With it, you can check out the updates before any of them are merged.
In contrast, git pull is a command that not only fetches but merges as well, and your local branch will be updated right away. This makes git pull it faster, but at the same time more aggressive because it will go ahead and apply all the changes on top of your current local state.
Anyway, let’s understand how to combine fetch and merge in the following section.
Combining Fetch and Merge
git pull is simply a shortcut that combines two Git commands, fetch and merge. It links up with the remote repository, gets the latest changes from your remote branch, and then merges those updates into the current local repository.
The process of fetching from a source branch first and merging with the current local branch in the second step is easily handled by the git pull command to sync the latest changes to your project.
However, as it directly merges the changes from one branch to another, you should always tread with caution and be prepared for update conflicts.
Now, let’s move into the following part to understand the command syntax.
Basic Usage of “git pull”
To keep your work up to date, it is important that you know how to use the pull command correctly. Here, we will discuss the syntax and commands for using the pull command as well as a few every day possible cases where you might need to use it.
Git Pull Syntax and Commands
The pull command supports the ordinary Git syntax:
git pull [remote] [branch][remote]: It should be the name of the online repository, the default name is “origin”.[branch]: Put here the name of your branch, usually main or master.
If you do not provide either the remote or the branch, then Git will use the default settings defined in your local repository.
Basic Git Pull Command Example
For instance, say you wish to fetch the latest changes from your remote repository named origin’s main branch. The syntax of the command is:
git pull origin mainWith this command, Git will fetch the latest changes from the origin repository’s main branch and merge them into your current working branch.
Common Scenarios for Using Git Pull
- Collaborative Projects: When working with other developers on a project, using pull command will ensure that your local repository is updated with the latest changes made by others. For instance, you would pull the repository before starting a task to ensure that your work is based on the latest codebase.
- Syncing your work: If you made changes on a different machine or the branch is changed by someone else,
git pulllets you sync those files to get in touch with the current working scenario. I have found this helpful, particularly when working across different development environments. - Update regularly: You will also want to periodically run
git pullto keep in step with your remote branch. This may avoid many conflicts and help your work progress smoothly.
With Git, you have two choices for how to incorporate changes from the remote repository when pulling, namely merge and rebase. Both have their pros and cons and are better used in different situations. We will differentiate between them and when to use git pull with rebase in the following section.
Git Pull with Rebase
Basic Command:It is simple, just run this command git pull --rebase. This can be achieved by adding the --rebase option to your pull command. Here’s how it works:
git pull --rebaseIn this way, it fetches the latest changes from the repository (remote) and puts your local commits on top of those fetched changes.
Specifying Remote and Branch:If you wish to pull from an explicitly named remote branch, it can be done by specifying the name like this:
git pull --rebase origin mainHere, the command is used to fetch recent changes from the main branch of the origin remote repository and rebase your local changes over it.
Handling Conflicts with Git Pull Rebase
Conflicts in a rebase work the same way as conflicts during any other type of merge. In this case, Git will stop the rebase and ask you to resolve conflicts by yourself. Assuming you have resolved the conflicts, continue rebasing using:
git rebase --continueIf at some point you decide that, no rebase is needed here, then you can just abort using:
git rebase --abortAutomatic Rebasing
To avoid this, and always use rebase when pulling by default, you can tell git to do so in your configuration with:
git config --global pull.rebase trueWhen you do a pull command next time, it will use rebase by default instead of merge.
So, in the following part, you will understand the difference between the merge with pull command and the rebase command. let’s move on.
Git Pull with Merge vs. Git Pull and Rebase
git pull merge: When you execute a pull command, it incorporates the changes from a remote repository into the current branch.
This means that it pulls in the latest changes from the remote repository and makes a new commit that merges these changes into your current branch. This keeps the history of both branches, but it can be quite a mess in your commit history, especially when there are multiple merge commits.
Rebase:This, on the other hand, erases your commit history too. Known as history rewriting, it reapplies your local commits on top of the changes from the remote branch instead of creating a merge commit.
This creates a linear commit history that is cleaner and simpler. But as rebase is a history rewriting operation, it needs to be handled properly so that issues like losing commits are prevented inadvertently.
But when and what do you have to use the pull command with rebase? let’s answer this question in the section below.
Using Pull with Rebase: When and Why
Clean History:If you like a clean commit log where tree contents are never interleaved with your commits, git pull --rebase will execute every commit from origin while allowing zero divergences into the original upstream.
It is particularly helpful in projects where transparency of commit history counts, like open-source projects or teams with a diligent code review process.
Keep Merge Commits Clean:If you observe too many merge commits or have a hard time understanding the way code changes are diffused into the mainline, rebase can help keep your branches clean with a linear commit history.
When you rebase, it will put your changes at the tip of what is in the master without adding any extra merge commits.
Small, Frequent Commits:If you work on a lot of small frequent commits, this can make it easier to integrate these changes whilst keeping your commit history clean and devoid of merge comments.
Wrapping Up
Working with Git, you need to keep your local repository up-to-date with the latest changes. This is where the git pull command comes into play. It pulls changes from a remote repository to your local branch and merges the pulled changes, which is inevitable in collaboration.
The process begins with fetching changes from the remote repository and then merging them into the local branch. In case of conflicts, Git will ask you to resolve them before it can complete the merge.
However, the git fetch command is different from the git pull. It also brings down all of the latest changes and newest code. Git pull does this all at once: fetch followed by a merge. It saves you some typing and is faster than doing the two steps separately. But we know what happens with merging. It can give us conflicts!
To get the same benefit, you could use git pull with the rebase option to replay your local commits on top of the changes that are fetched, resulting in a cleaner commit history.
It has a simple command syntax, and correctly using the commands is very critical for good collaboration without conflicts. Knowing when to use merge or rebase with git pull will allow you to control your commit history based on what you need in a particular project.
